YOUNG Volume 1 Number 3 1993
Academic capital and music tastes among Swedish
adolescents
KEITH ROE
Theoretical background
Following the work of Bourdieu & Passeron (1977, 1979) and
Bourdieu (1984), considerable attention has been devoted to the
role of education in social and cultural reproduction. While Bourdieu's
empirical focus has been on France, the heuristic value of his
model has been directly or indirectly demonstrated in studies
from countries as diverse as the United States (DiMaggio, 1982;
Farkas et al. 1990), Greece (Katsillis & Rubinson, 1990),
and Sweden (Roe, 1983, 1987, 1990, 1992). The purpose of this
article is to contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence
on the relationship between school achievement and cultural reproduction.
One of the starting points of Bourdieu & Passeron's analysis
is the need to relate cultural choices to the social conditionings
of their emergence and perpetuation. Cultural behaviours are seen
as determined less by individual tastes than by social determinisms
and it is the contribution of pedagogic action to these determinisms
which forms the dynamic core of their reproduction model. They
argue that classical theories tend to ignore the effect of symbolic
relations in the reproduction of power relations because they
sever the inter-relationships between cultural and social reproduction.
This results from the implicit premise that what pedagogic action
aims to reproduce is a common cultural capital shared by a whole
society whereas
In reality, because they correspond to the material
and symbolic interests of groups or classes differently situated
within the power relations, this pedagogic action tends to reproduce
the structure of the distribution of cultural capital among these
groups or classes, thereby contributing to the reproduction of
the social structure. (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1977:11)
While they acknowledge that the process of cultural reproduction
begins in the family, Bourdieu & Passeron argue that the influence
of social advantages and disadvantages on educational careers
and cultural life is cumulative. Thus, the habitus acquired in
the family structures the reception of classroom messages and
the habitus acquired at school conditions the reception of the
messages of the culture industries. This implies that, while the
school remains the only realistic path to culture for children
from lower socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds, it involves
being subjected to a process of acculturation, one of the effects
of which is the recognition of what constitutes 'legitimate' knowledge
and the devaluation of the knowledge which children from the dominated
classes possess (ibid, 1977:42; 1979:21-22).
Furthermore, they argue, an implicit prerequisite for success
in some subjects is the possession of extra-curricular attributes,
such as knowledge, tastes and 'good taste', which only students
from privileged backgrounds have. Such cultural privilege is manifested
in the familiarity with cultural works which only frequent direct
contact can give and,
It is still more manifest in the case of those works,
generally the most modern ones, which are the least....scholastic.
In every area of culture in which it is measured - be it the theatre,
music, painting, jazz, or the cinema - students have a richer
and more extensive knowledge the higher their social origin. (ibid,
1979:17)
and,
Far from constituting a parallel, alternative, or
compensatory culture, knowledge of cinema or jazz varies in direct
proportion to familiarity with the traditional arts....the groups
most integrated into the academic universe, and at the highest
levels, should have the best scores in jazz and cinema as well
as in other fields. (ibid, 1979:41)
This does not mean that the determination of cultural behaviours
in the model is mechanical; students from privileged backgrounds
may squander their cultural inheritance and some students from
less privileged backgrounds are able to overcome their cultural
disadvantages as a result of exceptional ability and certain features
of their family background. It follows that students are irreducible
solely to their class of origin and are better defined by their
current relation to it, i.e. in terms of their trajectory in the
social structure (ibid:23-25; cf. Rosengren & Windahl et al.
1989)
Thus, Bourdieu's empirical analyses demonstrate, on the one hand,
a close relationship between cultural practices, level of education
and, secondarily, social origin; on the other hand, at equivalent
levels of educational capital, that the weight of social origin
increases the further one moves from the most legitimate areas
of culture, becoming strongest in avant-garde culture. The relative
weight of home background and formal education is found to vary
according to the extent to which different cultural practices
are recognized and taught by the educational system. The more
the competences measured are recognized by the school system,
and the more academic the techniques used to measure them, the
stronger the relation found between performance and educational
qualification. The strongest correlations are obtained from questions
about composers of musical works and,
nothing more clearly affirms one's 'class', nothing
more infallibly classifies, than tastes in music. (ibid:14ó18)
These classifications are based on a general transposable disposition
towards legitimate culture, the cultivation of which, to a variable
extent according to students' social background, is largely achieved
by the school by means of its function of inculcating and imposing
values and by inscribing into the academic qualification a guarantee
not only of formal attainment, but also that the student has accumulated
the types of cultural accomplishment that are appropriate to the
prestige of the qualification. This synchronization is achieved
by formal and informal sorting mechanisms which directly and indirectly
manipulate students' self-image and self-esteem, and thereby also
their aspirations, so that students are channelled towards prestigeous
or low status positions which are more or less associated with
legitimate practice.
Nevertheless, while variations in educational qualifications may
be closely related to variations in cultural competence, the relationship
between educational qualifications and cultural practices cannot
be explained solely by the operation of the educational system.
Academic capital is seen as the guaranteed product of the interaction
of cultural transmission by the family and by the school. Thus,
Bourdieu finds that, at equivalent levels of academic capital,
differences in social origin are associated with differences in
taste and competence, and that, at equivalent levels of socio-economic
status, such differences are also associated with differences
in academic capital.
A general opposition is found within each social class between
the fractions richest in cultural capital and poorest in economic
capital and those richest in economic capital and poorest in cultural
capital. Those who have acquired the bulk of their cultural capital
in and for school are found to have more 'classical', safer, cultural
investments than those who have received a large cultural inheritance.
This is apparent particularly in the case of the relationship
which the lower middle class have with culture, especially their
propensity to accumulation of knowledge, and the considerable
gap manifested by them between this knowledge and cultural recognition
(ibid:39, 63-65, 331).
In this article the efficacy of the prediction that academic capital
will be related to cultural knowledge and preferences will be
tested empirically with respect to adolescents' liking for and
knowledge of various types of music. Since the model predicts
that academic capital will be related even to modern areas ostensibly
outside of the definition of legitimate scholastic culture, the
analysis embraces not only classical music and jazz, but also
pop and rock genres. This is also motivated by the fact that there
is evidence to suggest that some forms of rock may now be going
through a process of cultural legitimation. For example, Trondman
(1990) argues that tastes in rock now mark social distance between
classes and are related to the establishment of social hierarchies.
Method
The data presented here were collected by means of questionnaires
administered to 1,334 Swedish adolescents, aged 15-16 years, in
the ninth year of school. This is the final year of compulsory
schooling, although most students continue with some form of education
thereafter. The overall response rate was 98%. The data were collected
in 1984. As such, they are obviously in no way intended as a description
of the current music tastes of adolescents. The heuristic value
of the model lies in the prediction that tastes and knowledge
will reveal structural regularities which will be related to the
the activities of the educational system. The theoretical classes
are therefore, 'constructed for explanatory purposes and do not
necessarily exist as such as groups in reality' (Bourdieu, 1990:117).
The grades awarded to each pupil at the end of the autumn term
of the 9th year were obtained from school records. These grades
were awarded 3-4 months before the administration of the questionnaire.
Each student was awarded a grade from one (lowest) to five (highest)
for each subject studied. In these analyses each students' overall
grade average was employed.
Father's occupation is employed here as the indicator for socio-economic
status. These data were coded according to a classification employed
by the Swedish Central Statistical Bureau and are here grouped
into five categories: lower (unskilled) working class, upper (skilled)
working class, lower middle class, middle class, and upper middle
class.
The music preference data were obtained from respondents' numerical
ratings of music categories on a scale from 0 to 10. Eight music
types are analyzed here: pop, disco, synth (synthesizer rock),
rock, heavy metal rock, classical, jazz and blues. The music categories
were specified in consultation with a major record store in Lund
and, in the questionnaire, two examples of artists/composers were
given for each category.
The music knowledge data were collected by means of three items
designed to measure how much respondents knew about a wide range
of music forms from classical to heavy metal rock. The first asked
them to name one composer or artist associated with each of the
following kinds of music: jazz, blues, folk music, classical music,
opera and ballet. The second asked respondents to name 5 artists/bands
in the current Swedish top 20. The responses were coded from 0-5
correct answers, with reference to the published hit list. The
third asked them to classify 16 rock bands into the appropriate
rock categories. The responses were coded from 0-16 correct answers.
Results
Music tastes
The results of an analysis of means of the expressed liking for
eight kinds of music by school achievement, for each category
of father's occupation, are summarized in Figures 1-5. In each
figure the vertical axis represents liking for the music types
and the horizontal axis the level of school achievement. The analysis
was based on 1171 respondents.
The results for lower working class adolescents are summarized
in fig 1. For each type of music except one, high and very high
achievers from this social background expressed a higher mean
level of liking than did low and very low achievers. The exception
is liking for heavy metal which runs in the opposite direction.
The steepest curves in a positive direction are those for synth
and classical music, followed by disco. Pronounced positive linear
tendences can also be traced for pop and, to a lesser extent,
jazz. The flatest curve is that for rock, although it is essentially
similar in direction to those for pop and jazz. Conversely, liking
for heavy metal, by far the highest rated music among the very
low achievers, falls steadily with each category of achievement.
Among lower working class very low achievers, then, classical
music, jazz and blues are liked least; pop, synth, disco and rock
occupy intermediate positions; and heavy metal is by far the most
liked. By comparison, among the very high achievers, classical
music attains fifth position and surpasses liking for heavy metal,
as well as jazz and blues.
Figure 1. Liking for varoius kinds of music by school achievement
(means). Lower working class adolescents (n=254)
The results for upper working class adolescents are presented
in fig 2. In general terms they are similar to those for the lower
working class adolescents: Once again, the tendency of all the
curves, except that for heavy metal, is in a positive direction,
i.e the values for very high achievers are higher than those for
very low achievers; the curves for classical music, rock, blues
and jazz are similar to those in fig 1; and classical music surpasses
heavy metal among the very high achievers to achieve fifth ranked
place. However, there are also some noteworthy differences from
the previous figure. Heavy metal is not the most liked type of
music among very low achievers; the steepest curve is for pop
rather than synth, so that pop rises from fifth most liked among
very low achievers to second most liked among very high achievers;
and the direction of the curve is interrupted between low and
average achievers for heavy metal, rock and pop, an anomoly for
which there is no ready explanation.
Figure 2. Liking for various kinds of music by school achievement
(means). Upper working class adolescents (n=283)
Figure 3. Liking for various kinds of music by school achievements
(means). Lower middle class adolescents (n=279)
Since, according to Bourdieu, the lower middle class has the most
problematic relation to culture, greater irregularity is to be
expected here than in the other categories. This prediction receives
some support from the results shown in fig. 3. Firstly, although
the mean levels of liking for most of the music types are once
again higher for the very high achievers than they are for the
very low achievers, there are here two exceptions rather than
one with both heavy metal and rock sloping in a negative direction
and starting and finishing in close proximity. Secondly, with
the exception of synth, the slope of the curves is generally flatter
here than in any of the other figures. Thirdly, in five of the
eight music types (synth, pop, rock, classical and jazz) the means
for the very high achieving group are appreciably lower than those
for either the high or the average achieving group; a pattern
which was found in no other class category and which was particularly
striking in the case of rock and classical music. Indeed, in no
other social class category was the mean for classical music lower
among very high achievers than high achievers, let alone average
achievers.
Figure 4. Liking for various kinds of music by school achievements
(means). Middle class adolescents (n=194)

Figure 5. Liking for various kinds of music by school achievements
(means). Upper middle class adolescents (n=161)
A number of points distinguish the results for middle class adolescents
which are presented in fig. 4. First, the zero rating given to
classical music, blues and jazz by the very few very low achievers
in this category. Second, as with the lower middle class, all
the curves slope in a positive direction except heavy metal and
rock. Third, for the first time the steepest sloping curve is
that for classical music, especially from the high to the very
high achievers (among whom it ranks fourth, above e.g rock). Liking
for disco also increases steeply between these two achievement
groups. Finally, while lower middle class very high achievers
rated five kinds of music lower than did high achievers, middle
class very high achievers rated synth, disco, pop, classical and
rock higher than their high achieving counterparts.
The results for upper middle class adolescents are presented in
fig. 5. Note first that there were no very low achievers from
this background. Second, as with the other two middle class categories
the direction of all the curves is positive except those for heavy
metal and rock. As in the middle class, the steepest curve is
the one for classical music; although here the next steepest curve
is the negative one for heavy metal, which moves from second highest
position among low achievers to bottom position among very high
achievers. Note too that, in this group, liking for disco drops
as we move from upper middle class high to very high achievers,
the only other category where this occurred being the upper working
class.
In summary, some clear patterns may be discerned. First, the most
popular kind of music overall was synth. Only among lower working
class very low and low achievers, lower middle class very low
achievers, and middle class low achievers, was synth not the most
popular type of music. Synth received very high mean ratings from
average and above average achievers in particular. Disco was the
second most popular type of music, particularly in the above average
achievement groups.
Second, the direction of the curves for heavy metal was negative
in all five social class categories. Thus, although liking for
heavy metal was at its greatest among lower working class very
low achievers, it was also either the most liked or second most
liked type of music in all the other very low achieving groups,
even the middle and upper middle class ones. Moreover, with respect
to heavy metal, the differences between the class categories were
smaller than those within each class category, e.g. very high
achievers from the lower working class are closer to very high
achievers from the upper middle class than they are to low or
very low achievers from their own background - supporting the
hypothesis that school achievement helps to structure music tastes.
It is also worth noting that, among the very low achievers, by
far the largest difference with respect to heavy metal was that
between the lower working and upper working class groups, a result
also supporting the view that, within the broad social classes,
tastes in music vary appreciably in different educational groups
- in this case presumably because upper working class adolescents
doing badly at school try to distinguish themselves, by means
of musical style, from their lower working class counterparts.
Third, in contrast to heavy metal, the curves for classical music
were generally positive in all social class groups. With the exception
of the lower middle class very high achievers, there was a steep
rise in liking classical music in all the above average achieving
groups, including those from the working classes. Consequently,
as with heavy metal, the differences within the social classes
are greater than those between classes, e.g. lower working class
very high achievers are more like upper middle class high achievers
with respect to liking classical music than they are to average
or below average achievers from their own background. The group
liking for classical music most of all was not upper middle class
very high achievers, but very high achievers from the middle class,
perhaps indicating an element of aspiration. Note too that, as
predicted, the pattern of liking for jazz, and blues, was generally
similar to that for classical music, especially among the lower
working class, lower middle class and middle class below average
achievers, upper working class average achievers and lower middle
class very high achievers. Overall, blues (followed by jazz) was
liked least.
Finally, with respect to rock, the curves moved in a positive
direction in the two working class groups and in a negative direction
in the three middle class groups. Apparently rock means different
things in these social class contexts, having a generally positive
association with cultural legitimacy in the working class and
a generally negative association in the middle classes. This result
gives some support to Trondman's (ibid) thesis that, in contemporary
culture, rock may be used for marking social distance, but it
also ind
Knowledge of music
Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were computed
between father's occupation, school achievement and knowledge
of jazz, blues, folk music, classical music, opera and ballet.
The results are presented in table 1. They show that while amount
of music knowledge in each category is correlated significantly
with both father's occupational status and school achievement,
in each case the correlations for school achievement are higher.
Moreover, when the scores for music knowledge are added togther,
the resulting correlation coefficients are 0.18 with father's
occupation and 0.40 with school achievement, an indication of
the cumulative nature of the interrelationship between socio-economic
background and school achievement.
Table 1. Correlations between knowledge of various types of
music. By father's occupation and school achievement (Pearson's
product moment coefficients).
| Music type | Father's
Occupation
| School
Achievement |
| | |
| Jazz | .15 | .34
|
| Blues | .05* | .12
|
| Folk | .08** | .25
|
| Classical | .18 | .39
|
| Opera | .13 | .27
|
| Ballet | .07* | .15
|
| ALL | .18 | .40
|
| n = 1171 | |
|
All coefficients sig. <.001 except:
** = <.01 * = <0.5
Table 2. Knowledge of music (combined) by father's occupation
and school achievements (means).
This interrelationship becomes more apparent in the mean level
of knowledge of these types of music by each social class and
school achievement group (table 2). Knowledge increases according
to both socio-economic background and school achievement but is
at its lowest among very low achievers from the lower middle class
and lower working class, and at its highest among very high achievers
from lower middle class and upper middle class backgrounds. That
lower middle class very high achievers should have the highest
level of knowledge of any group is at first sight surprising considering
the fact that the results in fig 3. indicated that, of the very
high achievers, it was precisely this lower middle class group
that had by far the lowest mean level of liking for classical
music. That this group displays knowledge about cultural forms
which they do not like supports Bourdieu's view concerning their
cultural insecurity and propensity to invest in accumulating knowledge
of legitimate forms of culture.
These results, then, support the postulate that knowledge of these
more 'legitimate' forms of music increases by both SES and academic
status. The mean level of knowledge was lowest among lower working
class adolescents and highest among upper middle class adolescents.
At the same time, in every socio-economic category, knowledge
was greater among above-average achievers than it was among below-average
achievers.
Knowledge of the top 20 was also positively correlated with SES
and school achievement and, as for the music types analyzed above,
the correlation with achievement was the stronger. In other words,
both higher SES and higher achieving pupils tended to know more
about the top 20. Moreover, an analysis of means revealed that
the relationship between school achievement and top 20 knowledge
was linear: Very low achievers had a mean of 1.16 correct answers,
low achievers 2.17, average achievers 2.80, high achievers 3.21
and very high achievers 3.23 (Grand mean 2.7, S.D 2.0). There
was also a strong positive correlation between knowledge of the
top 20 and knowledge of the more legitimate music forms dealt
with above i.e those who knew more about the one, tended also
to know more about the other. Unlike the results for knowledge
of the other forms of music, knowledge of rock was not significantly
related to school achievement. However, there was a weak tendency
for those from higher status backgrounds to know more about it
than those from lower status backgrounds. There was also a moderately
strong positive correlation between knowledge of classical music,
opera, ballet etc. and knowledge of rock, indicating that those
knowing more about the one sphere tended also to know more about
the other. With the exception of the lack of correlation between
knowledge of rock and school achievement, all the music knowledge
results are in line with the predictions of Bourdieu's model.
Summary of results
In terms of the theoretical model, the most significant results
may be summarized as follows:
1. There was a generally positive relationship between school
achievement and liking for classical music. The only significant
aberration from the linear tendency was found among lower middle
class very high achievers. Although less regular, similar results
were obtained for synth, pop and disco.
2. The tastes expressed by high achievers from lower status backgrounds
were more similar to those expressed by high achievers from higher
status backgrounds than they were to the tastes expressed by low
achievers from lower status backgrounds.
3. There was a generally negative relationship between school
achievement and liking for heavy metal. In the three middle class
groups there was a similar, though much less negative tendency
for rock. Conversely, in the two working class groups there was
a positive tendency between achievement and the level of liking
for rock.
4. The tastes expressed by low achievers from higher status backgrounds
were more similar to those expressed by low achievers from lower
status backgrounds than they were to the tastes expressed by high
achievers from higher status backgrounds.
5. Jazz and blues manifested patterns closer to that of classical
music than to those of pop or rock.
6. Knowledge of more legitimate forms of music increased with
higher social status background.
7. Knowledge of more legitimate forms of music increased with
higher school achievement.
8. The association between school achievement and music knowledge
was stronger than that between social background and music knowledge.
9. The mean level of knowledge of all the types of music analyzed
was especially high among middle and upper middle class high and
very high achievers.
Discussion
The view that educational status is related to the cultural orientations
of individuals and groups is not new: Sorokin noted that, 'The
educational status of a person is one of the coordinates of his
personality and position in the socio-cultural universe' (1947:232).
Since then direct or indirect evidence of links between educational
status, subcultural attachment and music tastes has been steadily
accumulating (Coleman, 1961; Stinchcombe, 1964; Hargreaves, 1967;
Sugarman, 1967; Willis, 1977; Frith, 1983; Bourdieu, 1984; Fornäs
et al. 1988; Roe, 1983; 1987; 1990; 1992; Roe & Löfgren,
1988).
A theoretical model of the dynamics of these relationships is
provided by Bourdieu and Passeron (ibid). Starting with the assumption
that individuals do not randomly move about in social space, they
postulate that education, building on the habitus acquired in
the home, is the major mediating factor in the differentiation
of taste. This mediation makes it possible for some students from
higher status backgrounds to be assigned a low educational status
and for some students from lower status backgrounds to be assigned
a higher status. It is in this way that cultural tastes and knowledge
come to reflect the status relations of different groups, and
individuals come to experience different tastes as either attractive
or repulsive.
As Bourdieu points out (1990:131), this experience is analogous
to the development of a 'sense of one's place' (and of the place
of others) whereby individuals learn, subjectively, that, 'this
is (or is not) for me', to locate a position in social space through
a 'stance taken in symbolic space'. In this way the symbolic space
and the space of social positions may be conceived of as the independent
but homologous spaces within which social and cultural reproduction
is achieved (ibid).
This study supports Bourdieu's assertion that the sociology of
culture is inseparable from a sociology of education (and vice
versa). The mechanics of academic competition create not only
academic differences but even cultural differences that can last
a lifetime. Whether this is acceptable, or whether measures should
be taken to change the rules and procedures under which schools
perform the functions which society has assigned them is ultimately
a political choice. However, the ways in which the system operates
in these respects needs to be made explicit so that those involved
in education are forced to acknowledge that instituting academic
classifications is neither purely academic, nor based on wholly
objective differences, but rather involves imposing social definitions
and identities which have distinct, and sometimes undesirable,
cultural and behavioural outcomes.
As Foucault (1977:181-2)) has argued, hierarchical ranking serves,
in itself, as a reward or punishment. By distributing pupils in
a hierarchy, a constant pressure is exercised over them to conform
to the pedagogic authority of the educational institution by displaying
qualities such as subordination, docility, and attention to more
or less arbitrary studies and exercises. In this unequal power
struggle some students play by the rules and reap the academic
and cultural rewards which conformity brings; the majority become
bored and apathetic; and some react with a fierce antagonism to
the institution and the culture which it is perceived to represent,
and in so doing collaborate in consigning themselves to the future
which has been designated for them. One way of expressing this
antagonism is to flaunt provocative symbols and activities - and
for that purpose some forms of rock have always provided a rich
reservoir of possibilities.
References
BOURDIEU, PIERRE (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the
judgement of taste London: Routledge & Kegan
BOURDIEU, PIERRE (1990) In other words: Essays towards a reflexive
sociology Cambridge: Polity.
BOURDIEU, PIERRE & JEAN-CLAUDE PASSERON (1977) Reproduction
in education society and culture London: Sage.
BOURDIEU, PIERRE & JEAN-CLAUDE PASSERON (1979) The inheritors:
French students and their relation to culture University of
Chicago Press.
COLEMAN, JAMES S (1961) The adolescent society Glencoe:
Free Press.
DIMAGGIO, PAUL (1982) Cultural capital and school success: The
impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high
school students American sociological review 47. April.
189-201.
FARKAS, GEORGE, ROBERT GROBE, DANIEL SHEEHAN & YUAN SHUAN
(1990) Cultural resources and school success American sociological
review 55. February. 127-142.
FORNÄS, JOHAN, ULF LINDBERG & OVE SERNHEDE (1988) Under
rocken: Musikens roll i tre unga band Stockholm: Symposion.
FOUCAULT, MICHEL (1977) Discipline and punish: The birth of
the prison Harmondsworth: Penguin
FRITH, SIMON (1983) Sound effects: Youth, leisure and the politics
of rock'n'roll London: Constable.
HARGREAVES, DAVID H (1967) Social relations in a secondary
school London: Routledge & Kegan
KATSILLIS, JOHN & RICHARD RUBINSON (1990) Cultural capital,
student achievement, and educational reproduction: The case of
Greece American sociological review 55. April. 270-279.
ROE, KEITH (1983) Mass media and adolescent schooling: Conflict
or co-existence? Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell Int.
ROE, KEITH (1987) The school and music in adolescent socialization.
James Lull (ed) Popular music and communication.Newbury Park:
Sage.
ROE, KEITH (1990) Adolescents music use: A structural-cultural
approach. Keith Roe & Ulla Carlsson (eds) Popular music
research Gothenburg: NORDICOM.
ROE, KEITH (1992) 'Different destinies - different melodies: School
achievement, anticipated status, and adolescents' music use' To
appear in The European journal of communication Vol. 7.
Autumn.
ROE, KEITH & MONICA LÖFGREN (1988) Music video use and
educational achievement Popular music 7. 3. 303-314.
ROSENGREN, KARL ERIK & SVEN WINDAHL (1989) Media matter:
TV use in childhood and adolescence Norwood: N.J. Ablex.
SOROKIN, PITIRIM A (1947) Society, culture and personality:
Their structure and dynamics New York: Harper.
STINCHCOMBE, ARTHUR LEONARD (1964) Rebellion in a high school
Chicago: Quadrangle.
SUGARMAN, BARRY (1967) Involvement in youth culture, academic
achievement and conformity in school British journal of sociology
18. 151-164.
TRONDMAN, MATS (1990) Rock taste - on rock as symbolic capital.
A study of young people's music, taste and music making Keith
Roe & Ulla Carlsson (eds) Popular music research Gothenburg:
NORDICOM.
WILLIS, PAUL (1977) Learning to labour London: Saxon House.
YOUNG Volume 1 Number 3 1993
|